Emails show prosecutors misled public about plea deal with former Martinez Cabinet secretary

Print More

Ryan Flynn pictured at the Albuquerque Prisoner Transport Center after his arrest in May 2017

Assistant District Attorney Joshua Boone wanted to reassure his boss.

A political blogger was raising questions in early February about why the DA’s office had agreed to plead Ryan Flynn’s aggravated DWI charge, leveled after a May 20, 2017, traffic stop, down to careless driving. Flynn, one of the state’s most influential power brokers, was Gov. Susana Martinez’s former Environment Department secretary, and now heads up the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association.

In a Feb. 8 email, Boone told Bernalillo County DA Raúl Torrez he believed the case against Flynn could clear an initial legal hurdle.

Additionally, because Boone’s direct supervisor, Metro Division Chief Jason Greenlee, was “really good friends” with lawyers on Flynn’s defense team, Boone told Torrez prosecutors had removed Greenlee from making any decisions about the case.

But the Santa Fe Reporter and New Mexico In Depth have found that Greenlee was intimately involved with assessing evidence and negotiating Flynn’s plea throughout the case. Further, Boone, Greenlee and others misled SFR and NMID about the strength of Flynn’s case.

Taken together, Greenlee’s involvement and previous public statements raise fresh questions about whether the DA’s office did a favor for a high-profile defendant.

Emails obtained by the two news organizations show that Greenlee, far from being “removed” from the case, stayed in direct communication with one of Flynn’s defense lawyers throughout the criminal proceedings against Flynn last summer — and even directed Boone to plead the case out in August. Moreover, court records associated with the case are festooned with Greenlee’s name, showing he made numerous decisions about the prosecution.

For example, Kari Morrissey, one of Flynn’s defense attorneys, moved for a jury trial two months after Flynn’s arrest and only weeks before a plea deal was reached, writing in a July 25 motion: “Jason Greenlee was contacted and does not oppose this motion.”

As for the strength of the case against Flynn, despite telling his boss in the Feb. 8 email that he believed prosecutors had probable cause to move the case to trial — a key standard that informs prosecutors’ decisions — Boone told SFR and NMID the opposite during a telephone interview for a story published later that month.

The emails are a part of a cache of hundreds of pages of records released by Torrez’s office in response to requests under the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act. In February, SFR and NMID published a story raising questions about how Flynn escaped the drunken driving charge in an August plea deal.

Torrez told a journalist in an interview before the story published that he was not “directly involved” in Flynn’s case.

Months after the August plea deal, Torrez would find a partner in Gov. Martinez in his public lobbying effort that ultimately convinced state lawmakers to give his office a $4.3 million funding increase to help prosecute criminal cases. It made him one of the biggest winners of the 2018 legislative session.

The central theme of Torrez’s lobbying campaign for the millions in additional taxpayer dollars was that his office was underfunded in its efforts to put criminals behind bars and increase conviction rates, including on DWI cases.

Yet email exchanges about Flynn’s prosecution undercut Torrez’s claims that external factors, including lack of funding and police officers not showing up to court, hampered the office’s efforts to prosecute Flynn.

Neither Torrez, Boone or Greenlee responded to requests for comment for this story. 

Albuquerque police arrested Flynn around midnight May 20 after his luxury sedan swerved numerous times traveling northbound from downtown Albuquerque, delayed proceeding through a green light by 10 seconds and drove 10 mph under the posted speed limit, all with his headlights turned off, according to police reports.

A veteran DWI officer pulled Flynn over after seeing the sedan veer into a turn bay blocked by bright orange traffic barrels before Flynn steered it back over a solid divider line on an I-25 frontage road. Police video shows Flynn telling the officer numerous times during field sobriety tests that he was “nervous” but had not been drinking. But the officer decided to arrest Flynn after he noticed numerous signs of intoxication during those tests, and because Flynn’s eyes were bloodshot and watery, his speech was slow and slurred, and he smelled strongly of alcohol.

Flynn refused to take a breath test and was booked into the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center, where, according to one of his attorneys, a breath-test machine detected a small amount of alcohol. That test would have been administered about seven hours after his arrest.

Flynn has declined to answer specific questions about the case, including whether he was drinking, but he maintained in court proceedings and in an administrative review that he was not.

More than a month after his arrest, on June 25, a Sunday afternoon, Greenlee, the DA’s Metro Division chief, received an email from Morrissey, one of Flynn’s defense attorneys. The other is her law partner, Nicole Moss.

The subject line of the email: “Ryan Flynn video.”

Morrissey directed Greenlee to a link for Albuquerque police videos of Flynn’s May arrest. Morrissey wrote that if her dropbox link to the videos did not work, she would have the “discs delivered to your office for your review.”

Morrissey, in a brief telephone interview Wednesday, said she was unaware Greenlee was removed from decision-making in the case. Nobody in Torrez’s office was aware of Flynn’s high-profile positions during the criminal proceedings, she said before hanging up on a journalist.

On July 25, Greenlee emailed videos of Flynn’s arrest to Boone and another DWI prosecutor in the District Attorney’s Office, telling them Morrissey believed her client, Flynn, was not drunk the night of his arrest, despite refusing to take a breath-alcohol test.

Please watch all of these videos,” Greenlee instructed his subordinates. “Then we will look at the case. Kari Morrissey is convinced her client is not DWI and refused [a BAC test] because he is a fool. Let me know what you think after watching.”

On July 27,  Morrissey checked back in with Greenlee in an email.

“What are your thoughts?” Morrissey wrote.

Greenlee replied the next day in an email.

“I’m emailing the cop and hoping to have a phone conversation with him today,” he wrote.

Morrissey followed up on July 31, asking Greenlee, “Que pasa?”

“He can plea to careless driving and do the 1st offender program,” Greenlee replied. “Let’s set it for a plea relatively quickly.”

“Sounds good,” Morrissey replied in an email. Referencing Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court Judge Sharon Walton, she wrote: “I appreciate it. I will call Walton and get a plea setting.”

Flynn’s case had moved quickly.

Fewer than three months had passed from the night he was arrested until the lawyers brokered a plea deal. The court-mandated deadline for DWI prosecutions in New Mexico is six months — with many cases continuing long past that at the request of defense lawyers or prosecutors.

On Monday, Aug. 14, Greenlee emailed Boone, instructing him to “go to Walton today and plea Ryan Flynn.”

That happened the same day, sparing one of the state’s most influential politicos the stigma of a DWI charge.

5 thoughts on “Emails show prosecutors misled public about plea deal with former Martinez Cabinet secretary

  1. thank you for your dedication in your pursuit of justice for all here in Texas the same scenario lives out in the courts and i appreciate your work….i was recently in Hobbs New Mexico on a case wherein justice was being tried and thanks to your coverage justice was not totally squashed and upon my return to Texas i became a subscriber to your journey. thank you and God forever bless your journey. thanks for sharing.

  2. I believe that legislation was passed and signed during Gov Richardson’s administration that does not allow a dwi to be plead to a lower traffic charge. If it so, why did the judge accept this plea

  3. Further, having found the link to the entire IPRA email chain, having read them, it is clear that the reporter(s) ignored or desired not to report the most significant content, that being Page 25, “Findings By The Preponderance” that indicate 1. “The evidence DID NOT establish…” that the officer had reasonable grounds to believe the driver was DWI… and 2. “The evidence DID NOT establish…” that the officer lawfully arrested the suspect.

    This is a clear and sad example that some New Mexico journalists, like their national counterparts, will put the desired slant, angle or intended harm ahead of the unvarnished truth. This is why the institution is rapidly losing credibility and believability with the American people.

  4. What is more concerning to those of us activists in the fight to prevent New Mexico from becoming a total wasteland is the fact that Flynn works the Oil and Gas industry now! He patronized us and many other environmental activist groups the entire time he was in office. Oh how the righteous and might can fall! Or use his contacts to get away with playing with the law.

  5. Why does this story include only tightly “cropped” portions of cited emails. Seems like the reporter may be honing the content in context or not in context. The reader cannot discern. If you’re going to cite something, please respect your readers’ abilities to sift through the facts for themselves. The courts have an overload, particularly in ABQ. Prosecutors routinely evaluate the strength of evidence or lack thereof, and make pragmatic decisions. I viewed the video previously posted, Mr. Flynn appeared to be well in command of himself and his senses. Why is he not given the same benefit of the doubt all reasonable people deserve in this story?

    This story looks more like a journalistic political hatchet job.

Leave a Reply